19:13:55 | records: 17127 | dups: 0 | errors: 1 | sources: cache:17127 messages:0 | imap status: idle | last imap fetch: 19:13:53

dmarc poc

DMARC aggregate report viewer (proof of concept)

schlittermann.de
EN | DE
clear
records
4
parse errors
1
unique source IPs
1
report date range
2026-05-18 — 2026-07-14 02:00:00

Top 10 source IPs

networkcount
MSFT 5

Top 10 header-from domains

domaincount
tapir.example.com 4
dingo.example.com 1

Phase 1 — Discovery: who is sending mail from your domains? ⓘYou have published p=none and are collecting data. Nobody is being blocked yet.

Focus on message volume, not IP count — a source sending 50 000 messages is urgent; one sending 3 is noise.

Both-fail sources (DKIM fail AND SPF fail) are either spoofing attempts or services that were set up without telling you. Surface these first.

Expand a domain, then open "By source IP" to see the quadrant breakdown per prefix group.

Sender landscape
both pass SPF fail DKIM fail both fail
tapir.example.com 4
100%
MSFT total 4
IP PTR Total DMARC failures share
2603:10a6:10:231::8 — 4
Enterprise Outlook total 4

Top 10 failing source IPs

countsource IPPTR
4 2603:10a6:10:231::8ⓘ
domaindispdkimspf#
tapir.example.comrejectfailfail4
 		—
source IPheader-fromcount dispositionDKIMSPFreport begin
2603:10a6:10:231::8 tapir.example.com 1 reject fail fail 2026-05-18 02:00
2603:10a6:10:231::8 tapir.example.com 2 reject fail fail 2026-06-15 02:00
2603:10a6:10:231::8 tapir.example.com 1 reject fail fail 2026-07-13 02:00
dingo.example.com 1
100%
MSFT total 1
IP PTR Total DMARC failures share
2603:10a6:10:231::8 — 1
Enterprise Outlook total 1

Top 10 failing source IPs

countsource IPPTR
1 2603:10a6:10:231::8ⓘ
domaindispdkimspf#
dingo.example.comrejectfailfail1
 		—
source IPheader-fromcount dispositionDKIMSPFreport begin
2603:10a6:10:231::8 dingo.example.com 1 reject fail fail 2026-07-14 02:00

Phase 2 — Hardening: what would break if you tightened the policy? ⓘYou understand your sender landscape and want to move from p=none toward p=quarantine or p=reject. The risk is collateral damage to legitimate mail.

Policy readiness % = share of messages that would survive a reject policy today.

SPF-only sources need DKIM signing added in their sending platform.

DKIM-only sources need their SPF record aligned with your From: domain.

No DMARC alignment sources send all mail failing — configure or block.

Inconsistent sources have mixed results — investigate per-IP.

DMARC readiness
both pass SPF fail DKIM fail both fail
tapir.example.com 4 / 4
100%
MSFT 4 / 4
IP PTR Fail / Total DMARC failures share
2603:10a6:10:231::8 — 4 / 4

no DMARC alignment

Enterprise Outlook total 4

Top 10 failing source IPs

countsource IPPTR
4 2603:10a6:10:231::8ⓘ
domaindispdkimspf#
tapir.example.comrejectfailfail4
 —
source IPheader-fromcountdispositionDKIMSPFreport begin
2603:10a6:10:231::8tapir.example.com1reject fail fail 2026-05-18 02:00
2603:10a6:10:231::8tapir.example.com2reject fail fail 2026-06-15 02:00
2603:10a6:10:231::8tapir.example.com1reject fail fail 2026-07-13 02:00
dingo.example.com 1 / 1
100%
MSFT 1 / 1
IP PTR Fail / Total DMARC failures share
2603:10a6:10:231::8 — 1 / 1

no DMARC alignment

Enterprise Outlook total 1

Top 10 failing source IPs

countsource IPPTR
1 2603:10a6:10:231::8ⓘ
domaindispdkimspf#
dingo.example.comrejectfailfail1
 —
source IPheader-fromcountdispositionDKIMSPFreport begin
2603:10a6:10:231::8dingo.example.com1reject fail fail 2026-07-14 02:00

Phase 3 — Steady state: did something break? Is anyone spoofing you? ⓘYou have a tight policy in place (p=quarantine or p=reject). Watch for anomalies.

New sources — an IP appearing for the first time in the last 30 days that was not seen before. Could be a new legitimate sender nobody configured, or the start of a spoofing campaign.

Active failures — sources still failing DMARC under a strict policy in the last 30 days. Persistent failures with high volume are either spoofing or a misconfigured legitimate service that needs fixing.

If a major reporter (Google, Microsoft) stops appearing, your rua= address may be bouncing.

Alignment health — last 30 days
both pass SPF fail DKIM fail both fail
05-18
06-15
07-13
07-14
tapir.example.com 4 / 4
100%
05-18
06-15
07-13
07-14
MSFT new failing 4 / 4
IP PTR Fail / Total DMARC failures share
2603:10a6:10:231::8 — 4 / 4
Enterprise Outlook total 4

Top 10 failing source IPs

countsource IPPTR
4 2603:10a6:10:231::8ⓘ
domaindispdkimspf#
tapir.example.comrejectfailfail4
 —
source IPheader-fromcountdispositionDKIMSPFreport begin
2603:10a6:10:231::8tapir.example.com1reject fail fail 2026-05-18 02:00
2603:10a6:10:231::8tapir.example.com2reject fail fail 2026-06-15 02:00
2603:10a6:10:231::8tapir.example.com1reject fail fail 2026-07-13 02:00
dingo.example.com 1 / 1
100%
05-18
06-15
07-13
07-14
MSFT new failing 1 / 1
IP PTR Fail / Total DMARC failures share
2603:10a6:10:231::8 — 1 / 1
Enterprise Outlook total 1

Top 10 failing source IPs

countsource IPPTR
1 2603:10a6:10:231::8ⓘ
domaindispdkimspf#
dingo.example.comrejectfailfail1
 —
source IPheader-fromcountdispositionDKIMSPFreport begin
2603:10a6:10:231::8dingo.example.com1reject fail fail 2026-07-14 02:00