18:52:27 | records: 17125 | dups: 0 | errors: 1 | sources: cache:17125 messages:0 | imap status: idle | last imap fetch: 18:52:26
clear
records
4
parse errors
1
unique source IPs
1
report date range
2026-04-08 — 2026-06-29 02:00:00

Top 10 source IPs

networkcount
MSFT 4

Top 10 header-from domains

domaincount
tapir.example.com 4

Phase 1 — Discovery: who is sending mail from your domains? You have published p=none and are collecting data. Nobody is being blocked yet.

Focus on message volume, not IP count — a source sending 50 000 messages is urgent; one sending 3 is noise.

Both-fail sources (DKIM fail AND SPF fail) are either spoofing attempts or services that were set up without telling you. Surface these first.

Expand a domain, then open "By source IP" to see the quadrant breakdown per prefix group.

Sender landscape
both pass SPF fail DKIM fail both fail
tapir.example.com 4
100%
MSFT total 4
IP PTR Total DMARC failures share
52.101.66.131 mail-northeuropeazon11022131.outbound.protection.outlook.com 4
Enterprise Outlook total 4

No DMARC failures from this reporter.

source IPheader-fromcount dispositionDKIMSPFreport begin
52.101.66.131 tapir.example.com 1 none pass pass 2026-04-08 02:00
52.101.66.131 tapir.example.com 1 none pass pass 2026-05-18 02:00
52.101.66.131 tapir.example.com 1 none pass pass 2026-05-27 02:00
52.101.66.131 tapir.example.com 1 none pass pass 2026-06-29 02:00

Phase 2 — Hardening: what would break if you tightened the policy? You understand your sender landscape and want to move from p=none toward p=quarantine or p=reject. The risk is collateral damage to legitimate mail.

Policy readiness % = share of messages that would survive a reject policy today.

SPF-only sources need DKIM signing added in their sending platform.

DKIM-only sources need their SPF record aligned with your From: domain.

No DMARC alignment sources send all mail failing — configure or block.

Inconsistent sources have mixed results — investigate per-IP.

DMARC readiness
both pass SPF fail DKIM fail both fail

All sources are clean — ready to tighten policy.

Phase 3 — Steady state: did something break? Is anyone spoofing you? You have a tight policy in place (p=quarantine or p=reject). Watch for anomalies.

New sources — an IP appearing for the first time in the last 30 days that was not seen before. Could be a new legitimate sender nobody configured, or the start of a spoofing campaign.

Active failures — sources still failing DMARC under a strict policy in the last 30 days. Persistent failures with high volume are either spoofing or a misconfigured legitimate service that needs fixing.

If a major reporter (Google, Microsoft) stops appearing, your rua= address may be bouncing.

Alignment health — last 30 days
both pass SPF fail DKIM fail both fail
04-08
05-18
05-27
06-29
tapir.example.com 4 / 4
100%
04-08
05-18
05-27
06-29
MSFT new 4 / 4
IP PTR Fail / Total DMARC failures share
52.101.66.131 mail-northeuropeazon11022131.outbound.protection.outlook.com 0 / 4
Enterprise Outlook total 4

No DMARC failures from this reporter.

source IPheader-fromcountdispositionDKIMSPFreport begin
52.101.66.131tapir.example.com1none pass pass 2026-04-08 02:00
52.101.66.131tapir.example.com1none pass pass 2026-05-18 02:00
52.101.66.131tapir.example.com1none pass pass 2026-05-27 02:00
52.101.66.131tapir.example.com1none pass pass 2026-06-29 02:00